Campus, Home Page, In The Spotlight, News

Battle Ground School District Axes Sex Ed

As a student growing up in the Puyallup School District who lived with her, at the time, single father, I was permitted to attend the sexual health education classes provided by the elementary school. One year these classes taught young boys and girls about their respective anatomy. The next year we learned about the opposite bodies, as what I’d assume was a way to create a sense of empathy towards our peers and to build upon what we had learned the previous year. This was important for me because I recognized that this conversation could be uncomfortable for a man to have with his almost 10-year-old daughter.

On the very first day of seventh grade, I had my first period and remember this like it was yesterday. It was lunchtime, I was already nervous because I didn’t have anywhere to sit in an overcrowded lunchroom, in a new school where I couldn’t find anyone I knew. In my state of panic, I decided to go to the restroom and there it was. 

My panic rose for a moment. Taking a deep breath, I left the restroom to the nurse’s office. To my dismay, I had no idea where it was and no way to find it unless I asked an adult. I quickly spotted the vice-principal and asked him where it was. Curious about what I needed he asked what was wrong and all I could do was stare at him. It only took a few seconds for him to see the panic in my face, and immediately took me to the main office where the nurse’s office was tucked away. Once I was taken care of, I sent my dad a message to let him know that I needed things and he took care of it as soon as he could and that was that. 

Had I not had those classes in elementary school I may not have fully understood what was going on and my state of mild panic may have been more of a crisis. Instead, I was able to recognize what was going on and get it taken care of and my dad didn’t need to worry about anything beyond making sure I had what I needed and was okay. 

 Over the past year, the Battle Ground Public School system has been struggling to gain public approval of the Seattle based FLASH program. In October, Battle Ground Public Schools voted 3-2 to not only reject teaching the FLASH curriculum in its high schools, but to get rid of any form of sexual health education not required by the state of Washington. At this time, the only form of sexual health education required by state law is HIV/AIDs prevention.

  Two of the most common complaints held by parents is that the curriculum would encourage promiscuity among teenagers and would promote a LGBTQ lifestyle. According to Vicki Craft, representative of Washington’s seventeenth district, these classes aim to “groom and sexualize children.”

Shauna Walters, candidate for Battle-Grounds City Council Pos. 3, was quoted by The Columbian saying, “They do not care about respecting our local communities …rather, they only wish to disrupt our values and corrupt our children.” These allegations, which are unsubstantiated and harmful, have subsequently led to the irresponsible decision to get rid of sexual health education in grades 9-12 altogether by the Battle Ground Public School system.

 Sexual health education programs do not promote or encourage sexual activity. They do not teach teenagers how to have sex nor are they only about the physical act itself. They are designed to teach them how their bodies work, how to take care of their bodies, how to keep themselves safe when they are faced with making “adult” decisions and knowing their options in the event something awful happens to them. Teens deserve to know how their bodies work and how to take care of themselves mentally, physically and emotionally.

 As a teenager, my parents no longer permitted me to attend sexual health classes. That was, and is, their right. My parents thought they were protecting me and thought I didn’t need to know the answers because I wasn’t going to have sex until I was married. They believed this information was inappropriate for teenagers and the schools had no business teaching them “how to have sex” or promote teens making such adult decisions as if that was the only thing these classes did. They felt these classes overstepped the bounds of what schools should be teaching and parents should be teaching their kids these things so they can control what is taught. 

 According to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, studies have shown the opposite of what these parents claim. Comprehensive sexual health education has been proven to “reduce the rates of sexual activity, sexual risk behaviors, sexually transmitted infections and adolescent pregnancy.” (Visit www.acog.org for more detailed information).

Even though my parents felt it was their job to teach me these facts of life, they didn’t. As an adult, I have had to Google whether normal bodily occurrences were, in fact, normal or if there was something wrong with me. 

I was mortified asking my doctor for a birth control prescription or buying condoms from the store once I entered a serious relationship with my now-husband. I’ve even been self-conscious buying pregnancy tests as a married woman because these things were never normalized for me. They were seen as adult topics; things to be kept for marriage. Nobody gives you sex ed classes when you become an adult or get married.

Board President Troy McCoy has been quoted by Oregon Public Broadcasting, “I believed that the opt-out provisions gave our parents who didn’t want that curriculum that option… by changing that policy I believe we took away the freedom of those parents that wanted that curriculum to have it.”

It is bothersome that the loud voices of a few parents have created such a blatant disservice to the youth in Battle Ground High Schools. 

As it was, and is in most school districts, parents already retain the right to reject having their child participate in sex ed if they so choose. For the school district to let these baseless allegations affect all high school students by pulling the program entirely is reckless and puts these teens at a disadvantage for their futures.

 

Story written by Miranda Embrey 

3 Comments

  1. Kenny Smith

    If a school district offers sex education the state requires them to include LGBTQ indoctrination. I don’t believe the battle Ground parents have any objection to the education you received. By removing it from their offerings they joined nearly half of the 300 school districts in the state. I encourage anyone who wants to learn the truth about the issue to study the flash curriculum or find the video, “War on Children.” The state recently did a statewide survey of 10,000 people, mostly parents, and discovered a majority of the citizens know what Comprehension Sexuality Education is and want no part of it.

  2. Jennifer L Heine-Withee

    Ms. Embrey. I wish you would have gotten all of the facts about the decision made by the Battle Ground School Board and maybe talked to a few parents about their concerns. Have you even looked at the FLASH curriculum or read any opinion piece by anyone who has done the research? If you had then you would know that the sex education classes in the middle schools have not changed. Battle ground students will still receive sex education starting in 5th grade which focuses on human development. You would also know that the FLASH curriculum is full of mis information, false claims, and omits important information in regards to birth control failure rates, specifically condom use, and dangers associated with anal sex. The FLASH curriculum makes the claim that the with drawal method is free, always available, and works better than you might think. It also claims that condoms are vital in preventing the spread of HIV, STIs, and preventing pregnancy. It does not state that condoms have a 22% failure rate. In fact FLASH does not give a failure rates for any birth control, just uses feel good words such as “works pretty good”, or “works very well”. FLASH describes to students the process of anal sex yet no where does it say anything about the dangers associated with it. It does not mention that there is a high risk of contracting HIV or an STI from engaging in anal sex. It also does not talk about the risk of anal tears or incontinence which both come from having anal sex. Flash spends a great deal of time teaching students about gender identity, gender fluidity, And teaches kids that They can change their gender. Yes is dangerous and irresponsible when studies have shown that up to 95% of youth who are experiencing gender confusion will come to identify with their biological sex by the time they are an adult if they are left to develop normally. Instead it encourages students to go down a path of taking dangerous drugs which have not been FDA approved, followed by life altering surgery which leaves their body mutilated and unable to perform sexually. The FLASH curriculum makes the claim that it wants to encourage communication between students and their parents but then it teaches students that they can get birth control and abortions with out their parents knowledge and the state of Washington will pay for it. If you had done a little bit of research you would also know that the battle ground school board made the decision they did because Olympia will be making a crucial decision about sex education in all public schools in Washington and instead of spending more time and money coming up with a curriculum for the high school they are waiting to see what happens If you had done a little bit of research you would also know that the battle ground school board made the decision they did because Olympia will be making a crucial decision about sex education in all public schools in Washington this session, and instead of spending more time and money coming up with a curriculum for the high school, that they might need to change again, they are waiting to see what happens in Olympia. I am sorry that you have the false impression that battleground parents are somehow ignorant and backwards and don’t want their children to know about sex. That can’t be further from the truth. We don’t want our children being taught false information or misinformation and we don’t want our position as parent being subverted. We want our children to be taught the Truth about sex. Kids need the facts and the fact is the FLASH curriculum has been manufactured with the help of Planned Parenthood and highly promoted throughout the FLASH curriculum. Planned Parenthood makes millions and millions of dollars every year on abortions and contraceptive services. And now Planned Parenthood is starting to offer hormone treatments for Gender reassignment. They have a financial interest in getting kids hooked on their services at an early age and that is reflected in the FLASH curriculum.

  3. In other words, you pulled all your information from biased reporting and didn’t talk directly to parents or attend the board meetings to hear their testimony. Do you think it’s good to tell students the withdrawal method is free and always available without telling them it has a 22% failure rate? How about telling them that emergency contraception can be taken up to 5 days after unprotected sex without telling them it’s much less effective by day 5? Or failing to mention the risks associated with oral and anal sex in the numerous times they’re mentioned? The authors of FLASH do. And there’s much more. How would have felt as a 14 year-old sitting in a co-ed classroom while going over a detailed step-by-step description of an orgasm? Or role-playing for the class a scenario where your friend is trying to talk you into having sex with your new girlfriend?

    Had you talked to parents you’d know that most want good, basic sex ed, not the explicit and inaccurate curricula being pushed by OSPI. Research would reveal that most people don’t want Comprehensive Sex Ed. Even in OSPI’s own survey 58% of respondents said they don’t want CSE. Here is an op-ed from SW Washington Parent’s Rights in Education. If you’d like more information about what’s in the curriculum and why so many parents are opposed, please get in touch with us.

    https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/opinion/op-ed-why-would-anyone-object-to-a-medically-up-to-date-sex-ed-curriculum/

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*